Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-07 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Mirror black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is a little bit better than the LG Q70, having an 85.5 score against 77.9. Samsung Galaxy A51 is a just a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter device than LG Q70, even though they were released with only a couple of months difference. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A51 has 11 version and LG Q70 has Android 10.
Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a bit more vivid display than LG Q70, because it has a little larger display, a quite greater display density and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a bit better processing power than LG Q70. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 features a slightly better camera than LG Q70, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also counts with a way larger back camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and pictures and a camera in the back with lot more megapixels.
The LG Q70 features just a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A51's battery lifetime is just as good as the LG Q70 one.
The Galaxy A51 not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.