Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-05-07 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Mirror black | -- |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is much better than LG Q70, having a score of 91.3 against 77.9. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A52 5G has newer 12 version while LG Q70 has Android 10 version. Even though Galaxy A52 5G is a little thicker than LG Q70, it's a bit lighter and also newer.
Galaxy A52 5G features a little more vivid screen than LG Q70, because it has a just a bit more pixels per screen inch, a bit bigger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a slightly bigger storage for apps and games than LG Q70, because although it has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a little better processing power than LG Q70, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy A52 5G counts with a little longer battery lifetime than LG Q70, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Galaxy A52 5G features a superior camera than LG Q70, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a way bigger sensor and a camera in the back with a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.