Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-07 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Mirror black | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Q70 is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A70, getting a 77.9 score against 76.9. These devices come with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding OS features. Although LG Q70 is newer than the Samsung Galaxy A70, it's just a bit heavier and just a bit thicker.
Galaxy A70 features a little faster processing unit than LG Q70, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A70 also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy A70 counts with a display that's very similar to the LG Q70 one, because although the Galaxy A70 has a just a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bit larger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The LG Q70 counts with a little bit better storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A70 has just a little better battery performance than LG Q70, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
LG Q70 takes much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for capturing photos in poorly lited situations, they both have the same video resolution, a same size back-facing camera sensor and the same video frame rate.
Although LG Q70 is a better device, it costs more money than the Samsung Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A70. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the LG Q70, else you can save some dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy A70, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.