Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-07 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Mirror black | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Metal |
| $ 350.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A9 (2018) is slightly better than LG Q70, with an 85.2 score against 77.9. Despite of the fact that Galaxy A9 (2018) is older than LG Q70, it's body is just a little lighter and just a little bit thinner. The Galaxy A9 (2018) features a little faster processor than LG Q70, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A9 (2018) and LG Q70 count with really similar screens, although the Galaxy A9 (2018) has a little bit inferior pixel number in each screen inch, a little bit smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2220 resolution. LG Q70 features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for taking photos and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the same 30 fps video frame rate and a 0.36 inches back camera sensor, the LG Q70 also counts with a back-facing camera with much more MP.
LG Q70 has a little bit better storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG Q70 counts with a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.