Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-07 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Mirror black | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| $ 350.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is a lot better than the LG Q70's 77.9 general score. These devices work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version while LG Q70 has Android 10, so it gives you some nice extra features. Although Galaxy Fold and the LG Q70 were released with only a few months difference, Galaxy Fold's construction is much heavier but also somewhat thinner.
Samsung Galaxy Fold and LG Q70 count with similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy Fold has a just a bit less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a little larger screen and a little higher 1536 x 2152px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Fold has much more storage capacity for apps and games than LG Q70, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
Galaxy Fold has just a little better hardware performance than LG Q70, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy Fold features a bit longer battery duration than LG Q70, because it has a 10 percent greater battery size. LG Q70 has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light captures and videos, a tinier sensor capturing worse quality photographs and videos and worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG Q70 also counts with a much better resolution back facing camera.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG Q70, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG Q70. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy Fold, else you can save some money and get the LG Q70, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.