Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-07 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Mirror black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 398 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is much better than the LG Q70, with a score of 90.8 against 77.9. Samsung Galaxy Note 20's construction is a little bit thicker but a bit lighter than the LG Q70, and they were released with only 4 months difference. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a little better processing power than LG Q70, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy Note 20 counts with a bit better screen than LG Q70, because although it has a quite lower screen density, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bit larger display. LG Q70 counts with a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The LG Q70 and the Galaxy Note 20 have quite similar cameras, because although the Galaxy Note 20 has a back facing camera with lot less MP resolution, and they both have the same aperture, it also counts with a way higher video definition and a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than LG Q70, because it has an 8 percent larger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG Q70, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG Q70. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy Note 20, but if you don't you can save some money and get the LG Q70, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.