Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2020-05-07 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Mirror black | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 is a bit better than the LG Q70, getting an 81.2 score against 77.9. The Galaxy Note 3 is a older and just a little bit thicker cellphone than the LG Q70, but Samsung could make it somewhat lighter anyway. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 3 has 5.0 version while LG Q70 has Android 10.
The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a more vivid screen than LG Q70, although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080, a bit smaller display and a little inferior pixel amount per inch of screen. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a bit better hardware performance than LG Q70, because although it has 4 less CPU cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
The LG Q70 features a very superior storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG Q70 also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG Q70 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG Q70 also has a larger camera aperture, a bigger camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a back facing camera with way more megapixels.
The LG Q70 features superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 25% bigger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.