Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0, 4.4 |
| 2020-05-07 | 2014-09-03 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 5.96 x 3.24 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Mirror black | Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 335.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 525 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 18 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Edge is slightly better than the LG Q70, having a score of 81.7 against 77.9. Both devices in our current comparison use Android OS, but the Galaxy Note Edge has the previous 5.0 version and LG Q70 has Android 10. Although the Galaxy Note Edge is notably older and just a bit thicker than LG Q70, it's body is still somewhat lighter.
The Samsung Galaxy Note Edge counts with a bit superior processor than LG Q70, because although it has 1 GB less RAM memory and less cores , it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. The Galaxy Note Edge has a much sharper display than LG Q70, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater quantity of pixels per display inch.
LG Q70 has a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note Edge, because it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage. LG Q70 features greater battery lifetime than Galaxy Note Edge, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. LG Q70 captures slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note Edge, because although it has a smaller camera sensor taking less light and washed colors, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the LG Q70 also counts with a bigger camera aperture and a much more mega pixels camera.
Samsung Galaxy Note Edge is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bit cheaper, making this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.