Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-07 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Mirror black | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has an overall score of 80.4, which is a bit better than LG Q70's 77.9 score. Although the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is way older than LG Q70, it's design is lighter and a bit thinner. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a bit more vivid display than LG Q70, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a higher pixels count per display inch.
The LG Q70 counts with a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG Q70 also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has just a little better performance than LG Q70. Both have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount.
LG Q70 features improved battery duration than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh. LG Q70 shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor and a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low light photography and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the LG Q70 also counts with a way more megapixels back facing camera.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG Q70, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG Q70. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG Q70, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.