Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-07 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Mirror black | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 is much better than LG Q70, with an 89 score against 77.9. Galaxy Note10's design is just a little bit thinner and lighter than LG Q70, although both were only released with a couple months difference. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a bit better CPU than LG Q70, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Note10 counts with just a bit better looking display than LG Q70, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2280px resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher screen density. LG Q70 counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a smaller sensor shooting worse quality videos and pictures, a tinier aperture and lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the LG Q70 also counts with a way more mega pixels back facing camera.
LG Q70 features a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. LG Q70 has a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 14 percent larger battery size.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG Q70, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG Q70. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy Note10, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG Q70, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.