Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-07 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Mirror black | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note5 has a global score of 80.2, which is a bit better than LG Q70's overall score of 77.9. The Galaxy Note5 is an way older phone than the LG Q70, but Samsung managed to make it just a bit thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. The Galaxy Note5 has a bit faster processor than LG Q70. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
Galaxy Note5 counts with a bit sharper screen than LG Q70, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a better amount of pixels per inch in the display. The LG Q70 shoots clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the LG Q70 also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photography and a much better resolution back-facing camera.
The LG Q70 has a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the LG Q70 also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. LG Q70 has longer battery performance than Galaxy Note5, because it has a 33% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.