Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-07 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Mirror black | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note7 has a score of 79.5, which is just a bit better than LG Q70's 77.9 general score. Samsung Galaxy Note7 is an much older device than LG Q70, but Samsung could make it a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter. Samsung Galaxy Note7 has a bit sharper screen than LG Q70, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher display pixels density.
LG Q70 counts with just a bit better performance than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the LG Q70 also has a larger number of cores. LG Q70 features much more memory for games and applications than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have equal internal memory, the LG Q70 also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG Q70 counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor shooting lower quality videos and images and a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the LG Q70 also counts with a way higher 32 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
The LG Q70 counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has a 14 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.