Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-07 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Mirror black | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 has a global score of 88.3, which is much better than the LG Q70's 77.9 score. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S10 has the newer 11 version and LG Q70 has Android 10. Samsung Galaxy S10 is an older device than the LG Q70, but it is a bit thinner and way lighter anyway.
Galaxy S10 features a bit better hardware performance than LG Q70, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S10 features a much better looking screen than LG Q70, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels and a better pixels number per inch in the screen.
LG Q70 has a little bit better memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The LG Q70 counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy S10, because although it has worse video frame rates, a tinier back camera sensor and a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same video resolution, the LG Q70 also counts with a back camera with much more MP.
The LG Q70 features improved battery lifetime than Galaxy S10, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy S10 is also by far the cheapest, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.