Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-07 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Mirror black | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G is way better than LG Q70, having a global score of 93.6 against 77.9. These phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy S10 5G has the newer 11 version and LG Q70 has Android 10 version, providing some additional features. The Galaxy S10 5G is a a bit thinner cellphone than LG Q70, but both of them weight 6.98oz.
The Galaxy S10 5G features a bit superior processor than LG Q70, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy S10 5G features a bit sharper screen than LG Q70, because it has a bit bigger screen, a better 1440 x 3040 resolution and a higher pixel density.
LG Q70 captures clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has worse video frame rates, a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing images or video in low light situations and a smaller sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the LG Q70 also counts with a camera with a much better resolution.
LG Q70 has a quite bigger storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with just a bit longer battery life than LG Q70, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also the cheapest, making it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.