Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-07 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Mirror black | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Metal |
| $ 350.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 398 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is better than LG Q70, with a overall score of 89.7 against 77.9. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite's design has the same thickness than LG Q70, but it is a bit lighter. The Galaxy S10 Lite has a bit better looking screen than LG Q70, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite bigger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
Galaxy S10 Lite features a little bit better processing power than LG Q70, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has more RAM. The Galaxy S10 Lite has a better camera than LG Q70, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting photos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality, faster 60 fps video frame rates and a back facing camera with a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a slightly bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than LG Q70, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory. Galaxy S10 Lite counts with just a bit longer battery performance than LG Q70, because it has a 13% greater battery size.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is not only the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.