Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-07 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Mirror black | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e has a general score of 86.3, which is much better than the LG Q70's overall score of 77.9. The Galaxy S10e body is noticeably lighter and just a little thinner than the LG Q70, although it was released a little bit further than a year before. Galaxy S10e counts with a little bit better screen than LG Q70, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of screen.
The LG Q70 counts with slightly more storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy S10e, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a bit faster processing unit than LG Q70, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has more RAM.
LG Q70 takes slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a tinier sensor which provides a worse image and video quality, a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing photos or videos in low light situations and slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG Q70 also counts with a much more mega pixels back camera.
The LG Q70 features superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3100mAh.
The Galaxy S10e is more expensive than the LG Q70, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.