Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-07 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Mirror black | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 has an overall score of 94.8, which is much better than LG Q70's overall score of 77.9. Even when the Galaxy S20 and the LG Q70 were released with only a few months difference, the Galaxy S20 is a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 has a more recent 13 version and LG Q70 has Android 10 version, so it provides a couple nice extra features and performance enhancements.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a little bit better processing power than LG Q70, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has 8 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a better looking display than LG Q70, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px.
Samsung Galaxy S20 has a bit bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than LG Q70, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 takes clearer photographs and videos than LG Q70, because although it has a much worse resolution back-facing camera, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a much bigger back camera sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality.
The Galaxy S20 counts with a battery lifetime that's very similar to the battery duration in LG Q70.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 costs a lot more than the LG Q70, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.