Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-07 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Mirror black | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG Q70 has a global score of 77.9, which is a bit better than the Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 score. The LG Q70 construction is way newer and somewhat thinner than Galaxy S7 Active's, but it's just a little bit heavier. Galaxy S7 Active has a better looking display than LG Q70, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better quantity of pixels per inch in the display.
LG Q70 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the LG Q70 also has a higher number of cores. LG Q70 features a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage capacity.
The LG Q70 captures better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the LG Q70 also counts with a camera in the back with much more megapixels.
Galaxy S7 Active features a battery duration that's very similar to the battery lifetime in LG Q70.
Although LG Q70 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy S7 Active. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the LG Q70, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy S7 Active, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.