Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-07 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Mirror black | Black |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 398 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a general score of 81, which is slightly better than LG Q70's 77.9 general score. Even being the best phone in our current comparison, the Galaxy XCover Pro design is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than LG Q70. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS, but Galaxy XCover Pro has a more recent 11 version while LG Q70 has Android 10 version, providing some nice extra features and improved performance.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit more vivid display than LG Q70, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a bit higher pixels density. Galaxy XCover Pro has just a little better performance than LG Q70. Both have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
The LG Q70 has much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG Q70 also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG Q70 takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a lot more MP back facing camera and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little better battery lifetime than LG Q70, because it has a 1 percent greater battery capacity.
Galaxy XCover Pro costs more than LG Q70, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.