Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-07 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Mirror black | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum |
| $ 350.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is much better than LG Q70's 77.9 general score. Although Galaxy Z Flip and LG Q70 were released with only a couple of months difference, Galaxy Z Flip is thinner and just a bit lighter. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip has a more recent 12 version and LG Q70 has Android 10.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a little sharper display than LG Q70, because it has a little bit higher 1080 x 2636 resolution, a little bit larger display and a little better pixel amount in each inch of screen. LG Q70 has a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little better processing power than LG Q70, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM. The LG Q70 captures just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor which offers a worse photo and video quality and slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution and the same camera aperture, the LG Q70 also counts with a way higher 32 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
The LG Q70 counts with better battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG Q70, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG Q70. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy Z Flip, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG Q70, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.