Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-07 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Mirror black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum |
| $ 350.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is better than the LG Q70's 77.9 global score. These phones come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a newer 11 version while LG Q70 has Android 10 version. Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G and the LG Q70 were only released 3 months apart, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a slightly better looking screen than LG Q70, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a just a little better display density and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit superior CPU than LG Q70, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM memory.
The LG Q70 counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor which provides a lower image and video quality and worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the LG Q70 also counts with a much more mega pixels back-facing camera.
LG Q70 has more storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG Q70 counts with improved battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a lot more than the LG Q70, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.