Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-07 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Mirror black | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a global score of 94.6, which is way better than the LG Q70's 77.9 global score. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a newer 11 version while LG Q70 has Android 10 version, giving a lot of extra features. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 and LG Q70 were released with only a few months difference, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is thinner but also incredibly heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a little better hardware performance than LG Q70, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM memory. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit better display than LG Q70, because although it has a quite inferior count of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a better 1768 x 2208 resolution and a larger screen.
LG Q70 features a better storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. LG Q70 features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has slower video frame rates and a way smaller camera sensor providing a lot worse image quality, and they both have the same video definition and a F1.8 camera aperture, the LG Q70 also counts with a lot more mega pixels back facing camera.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit better battery life than LG Q70, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG Q70, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG Q70. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, otherwise you can save some money and buy the LG Q70, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.