Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Sony |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-05-07 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Mirror black | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 398 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has a general score of 79, which is a little bit better than LG Q70's score of 77.9. These phones use Android OS, but the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version and LG Q70 has Android 10 version, providing the user a couple nice extra features. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact design is lighter than the LG Q70, although it's a lot thicker and was released 2 years before.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a better display than LG Q70, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher amount of pixels in each inch of screen. Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a little faster processing unit than LG Q70. They have 4 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
LG Q70 counts with a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG Q70 also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact's camera is just as good as LG Q70's camera, because although the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a back-facing camera with lot less megapixels resolution and a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures in low light environments, it also counts with a larger sensor taking better quality videos and photographs.
The LG Q70 has a way better battery performance than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.