Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-07-21 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.87 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.15 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Gray | Blue and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is much better than the LG Q8, getting a overall score of 87.6 against 77.2. The LG V60 ThinQ construction is notably newer, but somewhat thicker and notably heavier than LG Q8. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but the LG V60 ThinQ has the older 11 version and LG Q8 has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit better processor than LG Q8, because it has a greater number of cores (and they are faster) and a greater amount of RAM memory. LG Q8 has a more vivid screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a higher quantity of pixels per inch of display and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG Q8, and although they both have a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 128 GB internal storage. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a very superior battery duration than LG Q8, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a slightly better camera than LG Q8, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a lot larger sensor capturing lot higher quality photos and videos, a back camera with much more mega pixels and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.