Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-07-21 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.87 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.15 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Gray | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is better than the LG Q8, having a general score of 87.1 against 77.2. LG Velvet is a somewhat heavier cellphone than LG Q8, but both of them have the same thickness. The LG Q8 features a brighter screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per screen inch and a slightly better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The LG Velvet features a little better performance than LG Q8, because it has a higher number of cores and a higher amount of RAM. LG Velvet has a better camera than LG Q8, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same video definition and the same aperture, the LG Velvet also has a much larger back camera sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality and a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
LG Velvet has a lot bigger storage for applications and games than LG Q8, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG Velvet also has 128 GB internal storage. LG Velvet has a superior battery duration than LG Q8, because it has a 4300mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.