Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-07-21 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.87 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.15 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gray | -- |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has a score of 90.7, which is better than LG Q8's score of 77.2. The Galaxy A52 construction is noticeably newer, but heavier and just a little bit thicker than the LG Q8. LG Q8 has a sharper display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher display density and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution.
Galaxy A52 has a little better hardware performance than LG Q8, because it has a greater number of cores and a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy A52 features a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than LG Q8, because although it has an external memory slot that admits 976 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy A52 features a lot better camera than LG Q8, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution and a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a much better battery duration than LG Q8, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.