Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-07-21 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.87 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.15 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Gray | Black |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 565 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a bit better than the LG Q8, having an 80.1 score against 77.2. Galaxy XCover FieldPro's body is much newer than the LG Q8's, although it is incredibly thicker and much heavier. Both phones we are comparing have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version while LG Q8 has Android 7.0 Nougat, providing you a couple additional features.
LG Q8 counts with a bit better screen than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a quite lower pixel density, and they both have the same resolution of 1440 x 2560, the LG Q8 also counts with a bit bigger display. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit superior processing unit than LG Q8, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has 4 more processing cores.
The LG Q8 counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture and a tinier sensor offering a worse image quality, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution and a back camera with a lot higher resolution. LG Q8 features just a bit bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a really longer battery life than LG Q8, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.