Compare phones
LG Remarq
MN240, LN240| Global Score | |
| 34.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| 2010-03-22 | 2018-06-08 |
| 3.50 x 2.50 x 0.60 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 3.80 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 6 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 129 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| -- | 6 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 4.51 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 0.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 900mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.4 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a general score of 81.3, which is way better than LG Remarq's overall score of 34.3. LG V35 ThinQ is a much newer and incredibly thinner device than LG Remarq, but it's also way heavier. LG V35 ThinQ features a very superior hardware performance than LG Remarq, because it has a greater number of faster cores.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with an incredibly better display than LG Remarq, because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and much more pixels per inch in the display. The LG V35 ThinQ features a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG Remarq, because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
LG V35 ThinQ has a lot better camera than LG Remarq, because it has a camera with much more mega pixels. The LG V35 ThinQ has a superior battery performance than LG Remarq, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity against 900mAh.
LG V35 ThinQ costs a little more money than the LG Remarq, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.