Search


Compare phones

LG Remarq

MN240, LN240

Samsung Seek

SPH-M350
Global Score
34.337.6
Basic Information
LGSamsung
2010-03-222010-05-10
3.50 x 2.50 x 0.60 inches4.12 x 2.08 x 0.58 inches
3.80 ounces3.85 ounces
$ 250.00$ 160.00
Display / Screen
--2.6 inches
320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
129 pixels per inch154 pixels per inch
No touch screenYes
5.65.6
processor processor
--128 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.765.76
microSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
11.32
Camera
1.30 MP1.30 MP
4.514.51
CDMACDMA
0.10.1
Battery Life
900mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
5.5 hours talk time5.8 hours talk time
2.42.56
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1, EDRBluetooth 2.1

Comparison review

The Samsung Seek has a score of 37.6, which is a bit better than LG Remarq's global score of 34.3. Samsung Seek's construction is just a little bit thinner but a little bit heavier than the LG Remarq, and they were released with only 2 months difference. Samsung Seek features a display that's just as good as the screen in LG Remarq, and although the Samsung Seek has a little bit more pixels per inch of display, they both have an equal resolution of 320 x 240 pixels.

Samsung Seek features a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG Remarq, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 32 GB. Samsung Seek's processor is very similar to the LG Remarq one, both of them have the same number of cores. The Samsung Seek has just a little bit longer battery life than LG Remarq, because it has a 1000mAh battery size against 900mAh.

The Samsung Seek's camera is just as good as LG Remarq's camera, both of them have a 1.3 MP resolution camera.

In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Seek is also a bargain compared to others.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.