Search


Compare phones

Global Score
3443.5
Basic Information
LGNokia
2011-08-112012-02-27
3.78 x 1.95 x 0.72 inches4.54 x 2.32 x 0.53 inches
3.42 ounces3.74 ounces
--Black, Blue, Gray, Red and Yellow
$ 70.00$ 70.00
Display / Screen
2 inches2.4 inches
176 x 220 pixels 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
141 pixels per inch167 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.76.2
processor Single-Core 1000 MHz processor
--128 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.767.29
Storage
--102,4 MB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
01.92
Camera
1.30 MP3.20 MP
--640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution
4.515.5
Networks
--Wi-Fi
CDMAHSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM
--SIM
0.13.6
Battery Life
1000mAh Li-Ion Battery1430mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
630 hours standby time
7 hours talk time
707 hours standby time
9 hours talk time
2.563.2
Other Features
BluetoothBluetooth 2.1, EDR
GPS--

Comparison review

Nokia Asha 302 is way better than the LG Revere, getting a overall score of 43.5 against 34. Nokia Asha 302's construction is way thinner but a bit heavier than the LG Revere, and both of them were released only 7 months apart. Nokia Asha 302 features a lot better performance than LG Revere, because it has a greater number of cores (and faster).

Nokia Asha 302 features just a bit better display than LG Revere, because it has a better resolution of 240 x 320 pixels, a bigger screen and a just a little greater screen pixels density. The Nokia Asha 302 has a way bigger memory for games and applications than LG Revere, because it has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 32 GB.

Nokia Asha 302 has a superior battery duration than LG Revere, because it has a 43% greater battery size. Nokia Asha 302 captures greater videos and photos than LG Revere, because it has a back facing camera with a way higher 3.2 mega pixels resolution.

Nokia Asha 302 and the LG Revere cost the same.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.