Search


Compare phones

Global Score
3639
Basic Information
LGBlackberry
--BlackBerry 5.0.x
2007-11-222010-04-26
3.93 x 1.99 x 0.59 inches4.41 x 2.44 x 0.55 inches
4.23 ounces4.80 ounces
$ 130.00$ 110.00
Display / Screen
2.2 inches2.4 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)480 x 360 pixels
TFTTFT
182 pixels per inch250 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
6.16.6
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
71,68 MB internal memory524,29 MB internal memory
microSD external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
0.52.42
Camera
2.00 MP3.20 MP
320 x 240 (QVGA) video resolution--
4.735.17
Networks
--Wi-Fi
HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSMHSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA
SIMSIM
0.93.7
Battery Life
900mAh Li-Ion Battery1400mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
250 hours standby time
3 hours talk time
312 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
2.43.12
Other Features
Bluetooth 1.2Bluetooth 2.1
--GPS
--Light Sensor

Comparison review

The BlackBerry Bold 9650 has a global score of 39, which is a little bit better than LG Shine CU720's general score of 36. The BlackBerry Bold 9650 is a noticeably newer and just a bit thinner device than the LG Shine CU720, but it is somewhat heavier. The BlackBerry Bold 9650 features a bit sharper display than LG Shine CU720, because it has a higher display pixels density, a way better resolution of 360 x 480 and a quite bigger display.

The BlackBerry Bold 9650 has a processor that's very similar to the LG Shine CU720 one, both have 0 cpu cores. BlackBerry Bold 9650 has a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than LG Shine CU720, because it has 452,61 MB more internal storage. The BlackBerry Bold 9650 has a much longer battery duration than LG Shine CU720, because it has a 56% larger battery capacity.

BlackBerry Bold 9650 shoots slightly better pictures and videos than LG Shine CU720, because it has a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels.

BlackBerry Bold 9650 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes it a great choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.