Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2018-06-18 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.30 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a global score of 80.7, which is much better than LG Stylo 4's 73.1 overall score. Although Google Pixel 3 XL and LG Stylo 4 were released only 4 months apart, the Google Pixel 3 XL construction is a bit thinner but a bit heavier. Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a bit faster CPU than LG Stylo 4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 3 XL also has 1 GB more RAM.
The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a sharper display than LG Stylo 4, because it has a quite bigger screen, a better display pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960px. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a much better camera than LG Stylo 4, because although it has a lower resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
LG Stylo 4 features a much greater storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 3 XL counts with just a bit better battery life than LG Stylo 4, because it has a 3430mAh battery size.
Google Pixel 3 XL costs a lot more money than the LG Stylo 4, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.