Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-18 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.30 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black | Black, Purple and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a is a little bit better than the LG Stylo 4, getting a overall score of 78.8 against 73.1. The Google Pixel 3a body has the same thickness than the LG Stylo 4, but it's somewhat lighter. The Google Pixel 3a has a little more vivid screen than LG Stylo 4, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2220 and a little bit better pixel quantity per inch in the screen.
LG Stylo 4 features a lot bigger memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 3a has a little faster processor than LG Stylo 4, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 3a also has more RAM memory.
The LG Stylo 4 has just a bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity. The Google Pixel 3a captures much clearer photographs and videos than LG Stylo 4, because although it has a back-facing camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better low-light captures and a lot better (4K) video definition.
Google Pixel 3a is way more expensive than LG Stylo 4, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.