Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2018-06-18 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.30 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is better than LG Stylo 4, having an 81.9 score against 73.1. The Google Pixel 4 is a a bit lighter phone than the LG Stylo 4, but both have the same thickness. Google Pixel 4 features a bit more powerful processing unit than LG Stylo 4, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 4 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 4 has a little sharper display than LG Stylo 4, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels. The LG Stylo 4 features a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG Stylo 4 features better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh. Google Pixel 4 counts with a better camera than LG Stylo 4, because although it has a back camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a much bigger aperture to take better low-light captures and a much better 3840x2160 video quality.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG Stylo 4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG Stylo 4. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Google Pixel 4, else you can save some dollars and get the LG Stylo 4, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.