Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-18 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.30 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black | Just black |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is better than LG Stylo 4, having a score of 82.9 against 73.1. The Google Pixel 4a construction has the same thickness than LG Stylo 4, but it's lighter. Google Pixel 4a has a little more vivid display than LG Stylo 4, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little greater number of pixels per inch of display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
Google Pixel 4a features a bit more powerful processing unit than LG Stylo 4, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has 3 GB more RAM. Google Pixel 4a counts with a superior camera than LG Stylo 4, because although it has a camera with a lower 12.2 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a way larger aperture for better low-light photography.
The LG Stylo 4 features a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The LG Stylo 4 has just a bit better battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3140mAh.
Although Google Pixel 4a is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG Stylo 4, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG Stylo 4. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Google Pixel 4a, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the LG Stylo 4, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.