Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| -- | Android 5.0 |
| 2018-06-18 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.30 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Metal | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | S-LCD 3 |
| 390 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.8 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 is a little bit better than LG Stylo 4, having a 77.7 score against 73.1. Despite of the fact the HTC One M9 is a lot older and somewhat thicker than the LG Stylo 4, it's design is still just a little bit lighter. The HTC One M9 has a better processing unit than LG Stylo 4, and although they both have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also has an extra graphics processor and a 64-bit CPU.
The HTC One M9 features a sharper screen than LG Stylo 4, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher pixels count per display inch. The LG Stylo 4 has a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than HTC One M9, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG Stylo 4 also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The HTC One M9 captures much clearer pictures and videos than LG Stylo 4, and although they both have a F2.2 aperture, the HTC One M9 also has a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution and a lot higher video quality. The LG Stylo 4 counts with superior battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
HTC One M9 costs more money than LG Stylo 4, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.