Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| 2018-06-18 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.30 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black | 16 777 216 |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | S-LCD 5 |
| 390 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The HTC U Ultra has a score of 77, which is slightly better than LG Stylo 4's 73.1 general score. HTC U Ultra's body is just a little thinner and a little bit lighter than LG Stylo 4, despite of the fact that it was released just 16 months before. HTC U Ultra features a processor that's just as good as the processing unit in LG Stylo 4, because although the HTC U Ultra has lesser cpu cores , it also counts with a greater amount of RAM.
HTC U Ultra features a bit more vivid display than LG Stylo 4, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher pixels density. The HTC U Ultra counts with a better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG Stylo 4, and although they both have a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB, the HTC U Ultra also has 32 GB more internal memory capacity.
The LG Stylo 4 has just a bit better battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. HTC U Ultra takes much clearer photos and videos than LG Stylo 4, because although it has a less mega-pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture and a lot better (4K) video resolution.
Although HTC U Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG Stylo 4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG Stylo 4. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the HTC U Ultra, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the LG Stylo 4, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.