Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2018-06-18 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.30 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black | Black and Gray |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 Fit is just a bit better than the LG Stylo 4, getting a general score of 77 against 73.1. LG G7 Fit is a just a little thinner and just a little bit lighter phone than LG Stylo 4, even when both were released only 5 months apart. The LG G7 Fit counts with a lot better looking screen than LG Stylo 4, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels number in each inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution.
The LG G7 Fit has a processing unit that is just as good as LG Stylo 4's processor, because although the LG G7 Fit has an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a larger amount of RAM. The LG G7 Fit has as much storage capacity to store more games and applications as LG Stylo 4, they have exactly the same 32 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG Stylo 4 counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity. LG G7 Fit features a better camera than LG Stylo 4, and although they both have a same size aperture, the LG G7 Fit also has a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a camera with a higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.