Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2018-06-18 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.30 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Metal | Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.8 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V10 has an overall score of 78.6, which is a little bit better than the LG Stylo 4's score of 73.1. Although it's the best device in this comparison review, LG V10 is an a lot older, just a bit thicker and heavier device than the LG Stylo 4. The LG V10 has a brighter display than LG Stylo 4, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440.
The LG V10 features a greater memory for apps and games than LG Stylo 4, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB, the LG V10 also has more internal storage capacity. The LG Stylo 4 has a bit better processing unit than LG V10, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores.
LG Stylo 4 features a bit superior battery performance than LG V10, because it has a 10% greater battery size. LG V10 shoots much clearer videos and photos than LG Stylo 4, because it has a larger camera aperture to take better photos and video in low-light environments, a way better 3840x2160 video quality and a back camera with more megapixels.
Although LG V10 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG Stylo 4, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG Stylo 4. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the LG Stylo 4, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.