Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| 2018-06-18 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.30 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black | Black and Gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is much better than LG Stylo 4's global score of 73.1. The LG V35 ThinQ design is just a little lighter and just a little thinner than the LG Stylo 4, even though both of them were only released with a few months difference. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a better looking screen than LG Stylo 4, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a greater pixel density.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little faster CPU than LG Stylo 4, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The LG V35 ThinQ has a greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG Stylo 4, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more internal memory capacity.
LG V35 ThinQ takes much clearer pictures and videos than LG Stylo 4, because it has a way larger diafragm aperture, a camera with a better 16 mega pixels resolution and a way higher (4K) video resolution. LG Stylo 4 and LG V35 ThinQ feature incredibly similar battery performance.
Although LG V35 ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG Stylo 4, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG Stylo 4. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy LG Stylo 4, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.