Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| 2018-06-18 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.30 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is better than LG Stylo 4, with a score of 87.1 against 73.1. Although LG Velvet is just a little heavier than LG Stylo 4, it's just a bit thinner and also newer. LG Velvet has a little sharper display than LG Stylo 4, because it has a bit bigger display, a quite better pixel count in each inch in the display and a little bit higher 1080 x 2460 resolution.
The LG Velvet has a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than LG Stylo 4, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB, the LG Velvet also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. LG Velvet features a little better performance than LG Stylo 4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG Velvet also has more RAM.
LG Velvet captures much better videos and photos than LG Stylo 4, because it has a much more megapixels back facing camera, a way better (4K) video quality and a larger camera aperture. LG Velvet counts with greater battery life than LG Stylo 4, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
The LG Velvet costs a lot more money than LG Stylo 4, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.