Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-18 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.30 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Metal | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.8 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than LG Stylo 4, having a global score of 87.1 against 73.1. Although the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is incredibly newer than LG Stylo 4, it is heavier and a little thicker. The LG Stylo 4 has an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 9 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a lot better screen than LG Stylo 4, because it has a bit better display pixels density, a quite larger screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than LG Stylo 4, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features better battery life than LG Stylo 4, because it has a 36 percent more battery capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots much better videos and photos than LG Stylo 4, because it has a way bigger diafragm aperture, a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a lot better 50 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.