Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-06-18 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.30 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Metal | -- |
| $ 129.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto Z Force is a little bit better than LG Stylo 4, with a overall score of 75.8 against 73.1. The Moto Z Force body is thinner and just a little lighter than LG Stylo 4, despite of the fact that it was released about 22 months before. Moto Z Force has a slightly better looking display than LG Stylo 4, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a higher pixels number in each display inch.
The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with more memory to install applications and games than LG Stylo 4, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has 32 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Moto Z Force features a bit faster processing unit than LG Stylo 4, because although it has less processing cores , it also counts with a greater amount of RAM.
The Moto Z Force has just a bit better battery duration than LG Stylo 4, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Moto Z Force captures much better photos and videos than LG Stylo 4, because it has a much better (4K) video quality, a lot more MP back facing camera and a bigger aperture.
Although Motorola Moto Z Force is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG Stylo 4, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG Stylo 4. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the LG Stylo 4, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.