Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| 2018-06-18 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.30 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom has a global score of 80, which is a little bit better than LG Stylo 4's general score of 73.1. The Motorola One Zoom is a newer device than the LG Stylo 4, although it's a little heavier and just a bit thicker. The Motorola One Zoom has a bit better processor than LG Stylo 4, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola One Zoom also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Motorola One Zoom counts with a little bit better display than LG Stylo 4, because it has a quite higher pixels number per screen inch, a little bigger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels. The LG Stylo 4 has just a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Motorola One Zoom has a lot better camera than LG Stylo 4, because it has a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels, a much bigger aperture to capture better low-light images and a lot better video resolution. Motorola One Zoom counts with better battery duration than LG Stylo 4, because it has a 21% greater battery size.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG Stylo 4, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG Stylo 4. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get LG Stylo 4, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.