Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-18 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.30 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| $ 129.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is much better than the LG Stylo 4, having an 87 score against 73.1. Motorola razr (2020)'s construction is noticeably newer and a little thinner, but also somewhat heavier than the LG Stylo 4. Motorola razr (2020) counts with a screen that is very similar to LG Stylo 4's screen, and although the Motorola razr (2020) has a bit less pixels per inch in the display and a bit worse 876 x 2142 resolution, they both have a same size screen.
The Motorola razr (2020) has just a bit better processing power than LG Stylo 4, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 5 GB more RAM. Motorola razr (2020) features a bit bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than LG Stylo 4, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
LG Stylo 4 features improved battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has an 18% greater battery size. Motorola razr (2020) has a much better camera than LG Stylo 4, because it has a much higher resolution back facing camera, a way better video quality and a much larger aperture.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG Stylo 4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG Stylo 4. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Motorola razr (2020), otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the LG Stylo 4, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.