Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-18 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.30 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 is better than the LG Stylo 4, having an 85.5 score against 73.1. The Samsung Galaxy A51 body has the same weight than LG Stylo 4, but it is a little thinner. Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than LG Stylo 4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a bit better looking display than LG Stylo 4, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a little more pixels per inch of display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Galaxy A51 counts with a better storage to install games and applications than LG Stylo 4, because although it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Galaxy A51 shoots much better videos and photos than LG Stylo 4, because it has a larger camera aperture, a way higher (4K) video resolution and a lot more MP back facing camera. The Samsung Galaxy A51 features longer battery life than LG Stylo 4, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Galaxy A51 is a lot more expensive than LG Stylo 4, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.