Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-18 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.30 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Metal | -- |
| $ 129.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is a lot better than the LG Stylo 4, getting a general score of 97.6 against 73.1. Even though Galaxy Fold is noticeably heavier than the LG Stylo 4, it's somewhat thinner and also newer. The Galaxy Fold has a bit more vivid display than LG Stylo 4, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1536 x 2152 pixels and a larger display.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games than LG Stylo 4, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a little faster processor than LG Stylo 4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Fold shoots much clearer pictures and videos than LG Stylo 4, because although it has a camera with less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a much bigger diafragm aperture and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. The Samsung Galaxy Fold has longer battery life than LG Stylo 4, because it has a 33 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG Stylo 4, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG Stylo 4. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get LG Stylo 4, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.