Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-18 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.30 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than LG Stylo 4, with a 98.9 score against 73.1. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's design has the same thickness than the LG Stylo 4, but it's somewhat heavier. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a brighter display than LG Stylo 4, because it has a greater pixels count in each display inch, a little bit larger screen and a better 1440 x 3088 resolution.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a faster CPU than LG Stylo 4, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 9 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a lot better camera than LG Stylo 4, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures and video, a much better video quality and a way more megapixels back camera.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than LG Stylo 4, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has greater battery duration than LG Stylo 4, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG Stylo 4, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG Stylo 4. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the LG Stylo 4, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.