Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2018-06-18 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.30 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Metal | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 5 has a general score of 79.3, which is a bit better than the LG Stylo 4's 73.1 score. Galaxy Note 5 is an noticeably older phone than the LG Stylo 4, but Samsung was able to make it just a little bit thinner and a little lighter anyway. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a better looking screen than LG Stylo 4, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
LG Stylo 4 has a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Stylo 4 has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy Note 5, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with more cpu cores (but slower).
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 shoots better pictures and videos than LG Stylo 4, because it has a bigger camera aperture to capture better captures in poorly lited situations, a back facing camera with a better resolution and a much higher video quality. The LG Stylo 4 features a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy Note 5 is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG Stylo 4, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG Stylo 4. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy Note 5, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the LG Stylo 4, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.