Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-18 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.30 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 is much better than the LG Stylo 4, having a general score of 88.3 against 73.1. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S10 and LG Stylo 4 were released only 9 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy S10 is just a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner. Samsung Galaxy S10 has a bit superior processor than LG Stylo 4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S10 features a much better looking screen than LG Stylo 4, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution and a higher screen density. The Samsung Galaxy S10 features a bigger memory to store more games and applications than LG Stylo 4, because although it has an external memory card slot that admits 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy S10 counts with a little longer battery duration than LG Stylo 4, because it has a 3 percent more battery size. The Galaxy S10 takes much better pictures and videos than LG Stylo 4, because although it has a lower 12 mega pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video definition and a lot larger aperture to take better low light images and video.
The Galaxy S10 is a lot more expensive than the LG Stylo 4, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.